I agree with that and I think that is *the* key point. If implementing regular language features exposes a flaw, fix the flaw.
I'm one of those that would rather have to refactor my code to "upgrade" to a new major version than try and work around some "flaw" just to maintain compatibility. - Brill Pappin On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Personally, I think the whole generics business exposes that the > one-one relation between components and models is flawed. Without > generics this isn't much of a problem, just the odd unused member and > constructor, but as generics aren't as 'optional' it is all very in > your face suddenly. [...] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
