No that doesn't really help, because I do not want to edit the second bean, I
only want to see all objects of the second bean. And if possible that
objects in a dropdownlist.
chears Michael
Dan Syrstad-2 wrote:
>
> In WWB, if you want the related bean to only show certain attributes, you
> can put something like:
>
> YourBean { ... props: name, -someOtherAttribute, ...; ... }
>
> in your beanprops file. This will remove "someOtherAttribute" from your
> view. Does that help?
>
> -Dan
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:02 AM, Michael_Bo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> No, i've added the dropdownchoice to the markup and did not forgot. My
>> problem is a little bit more complex.
>> with wicket web beans you can't display a bean, that has a relation to an
>> another bean. This relationed bean is showed with all attributes. But i
>> Only
>> wan't one or two, like 'name'. So What i've tried was to remove first the
>> relationed attribut from the bean, then create a BeanForm, and then add
>> my
>> special DropDownChoice to this created BeanForm. But because using the
>> wicket templates, adding an own Componte doesn't realy work.
>>
>> Did you understand the problem?
>>
>> chears Michael
>>
>>
>> greeklinux wrote:
>> >
>> > Do you add the DropDownChoice to the markup and forgott the wicket id?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Michael_Bo wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> i have a problem with some Components. I'm using Wicket Web beans.
>> >> If tried to add an additional form to a beanFrom. Then I get The
>> >> following Error:
>> >>
>> >> WicketMessage: The component(s) below failed to render. A common
>> problem
>> >> is that you have added a component in code but forgot to reference it
>> in
>> >> the markup (thus the component will never be rendered).
>> >>
>> >> 1. [MarkupContainer [Component id = beanRForm, page =
>> >> metaWicket.EditPage, path =
>> >> 2:beanForm:beanRForm.TkDataBeanEditPanel$TkbeanForm, isVisible = true,
>> >> isVersioned = true]]
>> >> 2. [MarkupContainer [Component id = beanDropDown, page =
>> >> metaWicket.EditPage, path =
>> >> 2:beanForm:beanRForm:beanDropDown.DropDownChoice, isVisible = true,
>> >> isVersioned = false]]
>> >>
>> >> Root cause:
>> >>
>> >> org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: The component(s) below
>> failed
>> >> to render. A common problem is that you have added a component in code
>> >> but forgot to reference it in the markup (thus the component will
>> never
>> >> be rendered).
>> >>
>> >> 1. [MarkupContainer [Component id = beanRForm, page =
>> >> metaWicket.EditPage, path =
>> >> 2:beanForm:beanRForm.TkDataBeanEditPanel$TkbeanForm, isVisible = true,
>> >> isVersioned = true]]
>> >> 2. [MarkupContainer [Component id = beanDropDown, page =
>> >> metaWicket.EditPage, path =
>> >> 2:beanForm:beanRForm:beanDropDown.DropDownChoice, isVisible = true,
>> >> isVersioned = false]]
>> >>
>> >> at org.apache.wicket.Page.checkRendering(Page.java:1116)
>> >> at org.apache.wicket.Page.renderPage(Page.java:914)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycle.redirectTo(WebRequestCycle.java:163)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.PageRequestTarget.respond(PageRequestTarget.java:58)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.respond(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:104)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond(RequestCycle.java:1172)
>> >> at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1243)
>> >> at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1330)
>> >> at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:493)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:358)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:194)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1089)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:365)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:181)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:712)
>> >> at
>> org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:405)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:139)
>> >> at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:295)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:503)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(HttpConnection.java:827)
>> >> at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:511)
>> >> at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:210)
>> >> at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:379)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> org.mortbay.jetty.bio.SocketConnector$Connection.run(SocketConnector.java:226)
>> >> at
>> >>
>> org.mortbay.thread.BoundedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(BoundedThreadPool.java:442)
>> >>
>> >> What I want is an Additional Dropdownchoice in my beanFrom because the
>> >> beanFrom gets its field from a Bean.
>> >> I don't really know in what .html file I have to put this additional
>> Bean
>> >>
>> >> chears
>> >> Michael
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/The-component%28s%29-below-failed-to-render-tp17803377p17821002.html
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/The-component%28s%29-below-failed-to-render-tp17803377p17879813.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
