What wicket version are you on? There was a bug about this but is has
long been fixed. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1095
Maurice
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:40 PM, smallufo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello ,
> I had exactly the same problem , and solved by searching to this post.
> Thanks a lot.
>
> BUT , today , I have another problem...
>
> Today , the ChildPanel can accept a new parameter : boolean defaultVisible
> if true , the content will be shown;
> if false , the content will be invisible , only the title bar is visible.
> The title bar is defined in ParentPanel , containing a title label and a
> "expand/collapse" ajax link (a toggle).
>
> Here comes the problem.
> In the ChildPanel , if I write :
> setVisible(defaultVisible);
> and if the defaultVisible is false , the whole panel , including ParentPanel
> (including title bar) will be invisible;
> This makes users unable to make it re-appear.
>
> However , if I write code like this :
> get("content").setVisible(defaultVisible);
> ("content" is the WebMarkupContainer defined in ParentPanel returning
> isTransparentResolver() TRUE)
>
> It will throw WicketRuntimeException while
> org.apache.wicket.Page.checkRendering
> org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: The component(s) below failed to
> render. A common problem is that you have added a component in code but
> forgot to reference it in the markup (thus the component will never be
> rendered).
>
> How to solve it ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2008/4/6 Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> You should do this:
>>
>> WMC wmc = new WMC("childContainer") {
>> @override boolean isTransparentResolver() { return true; }
>> };
>>
>> This is not a bug. If you do add() in the subclass's constructor, you
>> add to the page itself. Which is how the hierarchy is constructed. By
>> telling the WMC that it is a transparent resolver, you tell it to look
>> for children without attached markup in its siblings.
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 4/5/08, Oliver Sawade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> > my first mail to the list, i hope this wasn`t answered million times
>> > before, but the wicket users faq is empty so i couldn`t find it there ;)
>> >
>> > I'm using wicket1.3 to create a generic panel with the option to hide
>> > everything inside when clicking an ajax-button. While the actual
>> > hiding&showing works fine I'm having trouble with inheritance.
>> > This example should show what I mean:
>> >
>> > This is my generic super panel (no ajax stuff in it here to show the
>> > essential problem). The idea is, that the childContainer is set to
>> > Visible:false when the button is clicked. All of this should happen in
>> the
>> > super class, so i don't have to care about it in the child class:
>> >
>> > public class testSuperPanel extends Panel {
>> > public testSuperPanel(String id) {
>> > super(id);
>> > add(new WebMarkupContainer("childContainer"));
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>> > The markup for testSuperPanel:
>> > <wicket:panel>
>> > <div wicket:id="childContainer">
>> > <wicket:child/>
>> > </div>
>> > </wicket:panel>
>> >
>> > This is a sample child panel:
>> >
>> > public class testChildPanel extends testSuperPanel {
>> > public testChildPanel(String id) {
>> > super(id);
>> > add(new Label("childLabel","Test!"));
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>> > and the Markup:
>> > <wicket:extend>
>> > <span wicket:id="childLabel"></span>
>> > </wicket:extend>
>> >
>> > As you see, it should simply display "Test" inside a MarkupContainer
>> (which
>> > could be hidden from the superClass). When i try to display this Panel
>> > however I get an Exception stating that no code is added for the Label
>> > "childLabel"!
>> > This can be solved by adding the childLabel to the container in the
>> > superClass, but thats obviously not the way it is meant to be:
>> >
>> > public class testSuperPanel extends Panel {
>> > public testSuperPanel(String id) {
>> > super(id);
>> > WebMarkupContainer wmc = new
>> > WebMarkupContainer("childContainer");
>> > wmc.add(new Label("childLabel","Test!"));
>> > add(wmc);
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>> > So, is this a wicket bug with inheritance inside containers or am I just
>> > doing things the wrong way?
>> >
>> > Thanks for your help!
>> > best regards, Oli
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
>> Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released
>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
