I second Matej here... maybe instead of GenericPanel<T>, GenericFragment<T>, etc. you could name it something more explicit. Some examples:
SingleModelPanel<T> ModelBoundPanel<T> It took me the better part of one day to convert a partially genericized project (we started out with 1.3 then switched to 1.4 mid-stream). The project had 100k++ LOC. The resulting code is much easier to read. Another thing that you can consider adding to the core... a utilities class 'Models' to wrap models so you don't have those pesky <> all over the place: public MyPanel(String id, IModel<Integer> model) { super (id, Models.compound (model)); // wrap model in a CompoundPropertyModel } Matej Knopp-2 wrote: > > There is one thing that helped me quite a lot when migration the > project I'm working out. I've created GenericPanel, > GenericWebMarkupContainer and GenericFragment classes. In most cases > the only change was renaming Panel<MyClass> to GenericPanel<MyClass>. > > I was wondering, even though those classes were farily simple, we > might want to include them in Wicket anyway, for the sake of > consistency and convenience. > > -Matej > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> i looked through the code and it is fine by me. >> Lets test this then in a Build and see what people think of this. >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> unit tests are fixed... >>> >>> -igor >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Martijn Dashorst >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > I'm guessing somewhere this week or so. We need to flush out the unit >>> > test failures and get some preliminary feedback. Also we need to have >>> > time available to actually build the release. >>> > >>> > My time is limited because we're in the final stages before publishing >>> > and I have to read our book twice or so. >>> > >>> > Martijn >>> > >>> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:36 AM, James Carman >>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >> What sort of time frame are we looking at for a release with this new >>> >> generics paradigm? >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Igor Vaynberg >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Sven Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I've just converted two projects to the new generics setup and >>> everything >>> >>>> worked out nicely. >>> >>>> I think this is how generics should be applied to Wicket. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Igor, thanks for your hard work on this. >>> >>> >>> >>> wasnt just me :) >>> >>> >>> >>> -igor >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Sven >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Igor Vaynberg schrieb: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> development of the 1.4 branch has been quiet lately, this is >>> because >>> >>>>> the core team has been busy working on an alternative way of >>> >>>>> generifiing the framework. an early result of that effort can be >>> found >>> >>>>> here [1]. The key difference in [1] is that we have decoupled the >>> >>>>> component from the type of the model. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> here is the list of major differences: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> (1) only components that use their model have a generic type >>> >>>>> (components you are likely to call getmodel/getmodelobject on as a >>> >>>>> user). so far these are link,form,formcomponent >>> >>>>> subclasses,listview,listitem,(other repeaters will follow soon). >>> this >>> >>>>> allows for typesafety where it makes sense, and eliminates a ton >>> of >>> >>>>> noise from code. we will generify others upon request if a good >>> >>>>> usecase is provided and we think it is widely applicable. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> (2) non-generified components do not have IModel<T> get/setModel >>> and >>> T >>> >>>>> get/setModelObject, instead they have IModel<?>get/setDefaultModel >>> and >>> >>>>> Object get/setDefaultModelObject. this clearly expresses that the >>> >>>>> default component model is not tied to the type of component. this >>> is >>> >>>>> a bit of a pain from the code migration point of view, but we >>> think >>> is >>> >>>>> worth the effort. generifyed components are free to implement the >>> old >>> >>>>> IModel<T> get/setModel, etc, but have to keep the unsafe cast >>> inside. >>> >>>>> see ListItem for an example. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> basically we feel this is a much cleaner way then what is 1.4m2. >>> this >>> >>>>> is a call for confirmation/discussion from our user base. do try >>> to >>> >>>>> port a small project or a part of a larger project you are working >>> on >>> >>>>> to the [1] branch to see how the new api feels. if we do like this >>> >>>>> more the new branch will be merged into what will be 1.4m3. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> [1] >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/ivaynberg/generics >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> -igor >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >>> > Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released >>> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/generics-tp18083910p18222779.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]