igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Eelco Hillenius
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thats my point. you work on fields of one object, true, but it does
> not necessarily have to be the form's modelobject unless you use a
> compound property model.
>
The usage of a CompoundPropertyModel as a Form-model saved us quite some
typing and it's IMO
a very common use case. In fact, this it propbably the most relevant use
case for a CPM anyway.
So, I'm in favor of having a Form with Model (or at least a variation like a
ModelForm<T> ...)
... roland
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/generics-tp18083910p18231920.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
