Bounded is deprecated look at CompoundPropertyModel.bind(String)
so
CompoundPropertyModel cpm = new CompoundPropertyModel();
Form form = new Form("form", cpm)
form.add(new TextField("name", cpm.bind("firstName"));
johan
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you seen BoundCompoundPropertyModel?
>
> It sounds like you are looking for that behavior.
>
> Maurice
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Thomas Kappler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Thanks, Johan. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough about the motivation.
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> Why should the propertymodel be an inherited?
> >
> > Well, to have model sharing. So why not just use a CPM? Because it has
> > another difference to PM: you don't give the property expression
> > explicitly, but the component name is used. When you don't want that
> > (keep your HTML independent of your Java), or can't do that (reusable
> > panels), you can't use CPM.
> >
> > So, what I'd like is a CompoundPropertyModel(Object, String) that
> > works like in PM: "Construct with a wrapped (IModel) or unwrapped
> > (non-IModel) object and a property expression that works on the given
> > model.".
> >
> > I feel like I'm missing something basic here, sorry - perhaps you can
> > enlighten me why this wouldn't make sense.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Thomas
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
