Dmitry, it would probably be fairly easy to build your own support for this. Just look at how wicket-spring-annot is done, and translate that to support @Resource.
Eelco On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > because when we created @SpringBean there was no standard @Resource. > also, afaik, @Resource is part of jdk6 while Wicket requires 1.4/5. > > perhaps when we require jdk6 we can use @Resource > > -igor > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Dima Rzhevskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Why wicket framework used it's own annotation @SpringBean instead standard >> annotation @Resource? >> (I want configure other web framework to use anotation for bean injecting) >> >> Dmitry. >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
