Wow cool, thanks!
Regards
Vyas, Anirudh
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> something like this is planned for 1.5
>
> 1.4 is just 1.3+generics so this is outside of 1.4's scope.
>
> -igor
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Ricky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was looking at Feedback Message and the levels defined as integers, in
> > move to Wicket 1.4, can we have an enumeration (or a class) like
> > FeedbackMessageLevel, here's the example :
> >
> > public enum FeedbackMessageLevel{
> >
> > // Debug level
> > DEBUG(100),
> >
> > // Error level
> > ERROR (400),
> >
> > // fatal level
> > FATAL(500);
> >
> > ... // and so on.
> >
> > }
> >
> > Inside this enum we can have a method that compares levels. (something
> like
> > comparator).Should we want this to be more flexible, (because enumeration
> > limits us from using just finite states), we can go for a Level class may
> > be.
> > *What will this buy me?*
> > Type safety, you can do a lot of things using enumeration (comparison is
> one
> > example), if we have a level class it is very very flexible (similar in
> > concept to logging frameworks). Plus its not such a good idea to have
> small
> > ints as a message level.
> >
> >
> > I don't know just some inputs, Any thoughts??
> >
> > Regards
> > Vyas, Anirudh
> > || ॐ ||
> >
>
