igor.vaynberg wrote:
> 
> why dont you use the code in spring or databinder as an example then?
> best way to learn anyways.
> 

Ha ha, that's what I was wondering. The code to integrate with an ORM either
has to be in a library or in your own project. Those are the only options,
and the second option kind of sucks (unless you only ever work on one Wicket
project, or you like maintaing and upgrading disjoint copies of the same
code). That is probably why there aren't any published and up-to-date
examples of that kind of app; it's just not a compelling approach that is
going to motivate someone to build and maintain example applications
(generally a frustrating and thankless chore).

Those that insist on taking the hard road of app-specific integration (or
building their own libraries) will have to live with it being the hard road.
The fact that I've put some code out there should make it easier, but the
independent route will never have a chauffeur. And hey, if anyone ever has
weight loss ideas for Databinder, I'm all ears (but I'd like to see your
scale first). It's already broken down into modules; the only thing I could
guess is that the module boundaries didn't line up exactly with a desired
subset, but we can always make MOAR modules.

Nathan
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-%2B-Hibernate-without-Spring-and-Databinder-tp18827595p18835350.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to