> it is there for situations where you do not want to render any tag > into the output because it may cause invalid markup, etc.
I understood from the specs that it is always allowed (according to the namespace) and in the above example it could be used to ajax-refresh those two table rows. ** Martin > > On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Martin Makundi > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I want to use my wicketContainer (wicket:container tag) for a >> placeholder for a ajax replace. >> >> I have the following settings: >> >> // ... >> getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true); >> // ... >> >> wicketContainer.setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true).setRenderBodyOnly(false); >> >> Nevertheless, the wicketContainer appears to be stripped from the >> rendered page and the ajax-refresh does not work (no tag, no markup >> id). >> >> Is this a "bug" or is it supposed to work this way? I assumed that >> "stripWicketTags" would strip the 'useless' wickt tags but allow to >> override and show the necessary tags. >> >> ** >> Martin >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
