The Serlializable-check isn't sufficient. you can mark any class serializable if you want. what really counts is that all fields of the class are serializable, you should have a look at them ...
TH Lim wrote: > > I am aware of the "$1". I did the instanceof check in my code. I printed > the class name which is, of course, "LinkedListMultimap$1" and it is > indeed an instanceof Serializable. So basically, LinkedListMultimap$1 > implements Serializable but it failed the checking at > org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker.check(SerializableChecker.java:342). > I find this very puzzling. > > > Pierre Coquentin wrote: >> >> This is the anonymous inner class inside the LinkedListMultimap class >> which is not Serializable (LinkedListMultimap*$1*) >> Best regards >> >> Pierre >> >> >> TH Lim a écrit : >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am using Google collections with Wicket 1.3.4 and hit with this >>> serialization error. >>> >>> ERROR - Objects - Error serializing object class >>> web.AdminPage [object=[Page class = web.AdminPage, id = 5, version = 0]] >>> org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker$WicketNotSerializableException: >>> Unable to serialize class: >>> com.google.common.collect.LinkedListMultimap$1 >>> >>> I am pretty sure LinkedListMultimap is Serializable and I even did a >>> test >>> i.e. obj instaceof Serializable >>> >>> What am I missing here? Any input? Thanks. >>> >>> /lim/ >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > ----- Michael Sparer http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Unable-to-serialize-class-com.google.common.collect.LinkedListMultimap%241-tp19027449p19028210.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
