yes good point.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Martijn Dashorst < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it is a nice *not* to have. If head sections were included > automatically, there is no way to distinguish between stuff that is > there for design purposes and runtime purposes. > > Martijn > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Wayne Pope > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > :-) that might be it! > > > > Its a none issue really, just would be 'nice to have' > > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Martijn Dashorst < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> There is the slight possibility that the wiki is inaccurate. > >> > >> Martijn > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Wayne Pope > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I just wanted to check I'm not alone on this, before going to the dev > >> group. > >> > I've created a simple base page and markup and using market > inheritance I > >> > have a child page with the content. > >> > > >> > This worsd fine, except that Wicket does not interprets <head> as > >> > <wicket:head> automatically in the child page - as stated on the Wiki. > I > >> > need to use <wicket:head> to get it work. > >> > > >> > Anyone have this working without using <wicket:head>? > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > >> Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released > >> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
