Thanks for the explanation Matej. Makes perfect sense.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote: > > I was thinking about implementing it like this. > > But, it would make code that is already complicated even more > complicated. What's worst, it wouldn't work in clustered environment > where you need to send the page across cluster on every request. > > So the possible performance benefit of this would only show in > non-clustered environment for ajax requests. Also it might cause other > problems with inter page references. > > I don't think the possible performance benefit is worth it, because > when you need more performance, you usually cluster the application. > And on cluster you usually want to have failover too. > > Btw, in 1.5 there is another pagestore planned that is lightweight (no > serialization) but with limited backbutton support (no page > versioning, only certain amount of pages in memory). > > -Matej > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Page-serialisation-tp19072319p19089988.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
