While I like the language, I think it is a wrong path, because the
number of methods would explode:

new TextField().setRequired().setInvisible().isDisabled();

For each setFoo action you would get a setNotFoo action, and
corresponding isNotFoo query.

Martijn

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Jan Kriesten
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Uwe,
>
>> new TextField(..).setRequired().setVisible().setEnabled()
>> instead of having to
>> new TextField(..).setRequired(true).setVisible(true).setEnabled(true)
>>
>> what do you think ?
>
> naaaaah - you're just lazy. ;-) Not more convenience-methods, there are 
> already
> too many...
>
> Best regards, --- Jan.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to