both ways of doing it? i think there are 2 now right? the one that was made up first and now the one that is just the pagestore?
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right now there really isn't any practical reason for having > IClusterable at all. > > Even terracotta uses regular serialization to get pages over cluster. > > -Matej > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > if you have objects that would be kept in the session, you have to use > > Serializable. > > at the moment you use that you can choose for IClusterable so that when > you > > use terracotta it will be clustered > > > > johan > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:14 PM, shetc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > >> I guess my real questions was: What objects in a Wicket application > should > >> be > >> marked as clusterable? > >> (Or did you already answer that? :confused: ) > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://www.nabble.com/IClusterable----When-should-it-be-used--tp19163261p19169507.html > >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
