Probably not for 1.3/1.4. We could have something like that for 1.5
(where the ajax pipeline is completely new).

-Matej

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 6:23 PM, John Krasnay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm testing some Ajax-y Wicket pages with Selenium. One challenge I'm
> having is finding a good expression to use in Selenium's
> waitForCondition. Right now I wait for the results of the Ajax call,
> e.g. an appropriate element appearing, but it's sometimes difficult to
> get this right, e.g. if a component is being replaced.
>
> I think an ideal approach would be to hook into Wicket's Ajax channels
> and wait for them to be empty before proceeding. I've looked into
> wicket-ajax.js and it looks like I should be able to loop through
> Wicket.channelManager.channels and check the busy slot on each.
>
> Has anyone else tried this? Does it sound like a good approach? Would it
> be a good idea for wicket-ajax.js to provide a method for checking this?
>
> jk
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to