Its probably not fool-proof, but it has worked fine up till now........
public class MyLDM<T extends MyDomainModelIF> extends
LoadableDetachableModel{
private MyServiceIF<T> modelLoaderService;
private Long id;
/**
* Constructor.
*
* @param object the model to make 'detachable'
* @param modelLoaderService used to load the model
*/
public MyLDM(T object, MyServiceIF<T> modelLoaderService){
super(object);
this.modelLoaderService = modelLoaderService;
this.id = object.getId();
}
public MyLDM(Long id){
super();
this.id = id;
}
@Override
protected T load() {
return modelLoaderService.load(id);
}
public void setId(Long id) {
this.id = id;
}
@Override
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public T getObject(){
return (T)super.getObject();
}
}
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> what is your ldm implementation look like?
>
> and yes, delayed construction is always the way to go.
>
> -igor
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Neil McT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/LazyInit-error-with-LDM-in-a-panel-tp20228580p20231137.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
