I made a Quickstart, but I can't reproduce the problem... arrrr.... I'll play around with it. Ilja
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 7:47 PM, jWeekend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > Ilja, > > I assumed that most people are using Quickstart - I find it very handy. > Take a look at http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html this or > http://herebebeasties.com/2007-10-07/wicket-quickstart/ Al's screencast > (which predates the command line generator). > It takes 2 minutes (plus dependency download time) to make your fully > functional skeleton Wicket project. > Remember to keep your example app as simple as possible - with just enough > functionality to demonstrate the issue you're facing. > > Regards - Cemal > http://www.jWeekend.co.uk http://jWeekend.co.uk > > > Ilja-8 wrote: > > > > Igor,I tried to make a quickstart but the latest wicket version available > > in > > any of the quickstart downloads is 1.2. > > Is there a quickstart for rc1 somewhere? > > I would try to make it work but work doesn't leave me a lot of time... > > Ilja > > > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Igor Vaynberg > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > >> there are two ways to do this: > >> a) there is wicket-quickstart project in svn which you can customize and > >> zip. > >> b) use maven. download and install maven, go to wicket.apache.org and > >> find the quickstart page which will gen the command line necessary to > >> let maven build the project. if this is the first time you run maven > >> it might take a good while because it has to download a ton of > >> dependencies. > >> > >> -igor > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Ilja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >> > Yeah... like I said before, I don't use Maven and you're probably > >> talking > >> > about a Maven QuickStart? Is that right?Can you give a few pointers on > >> how > >> > to do a QuickStart? > >> > Is there anything on the web? > >> > ilja > >> > > >> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Igor Vaynberg < > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> >> i guess then we need more info. if you can create a quickstart that > >> >> would be optimal. > >> >> > >> >> -igor > >> >> > >> >> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Ilja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >> >> > Igor, rc1 gives me the exact same problem m3 gave me... > >> >> > > >> >> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Igor Vaynberg < > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> >wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> rc1 is out, why dont you try with that. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -igor > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Ilja <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > P.S.By "my problem is solved" I mean, obviously, that I'll > stick > >> with > >> >> m2 > >> >> >> for > >> >> >> > the time being. > >> >> >> > Didn't mean to sound like that is ideal, or that I'm not > >> concerned > >> >> that > >> >> >> the > >> >> >> > problem appears in m3. > >> >> >> > Let me know if I can do anything to help out with that. > >> >> >> > Cheers, > >> >> >> > ilja > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Ilja > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> You guys will want to know this: > >> >> >> >> I figured that perhaps the problem lies with Wicket1.4-m3. > >> >> >> >> So I swapped it out for Wicket1.4-m2. > >> >> >> >> I did not change my code at all. I didn't change anything else. > >> All I > >> >> >> did > >> >> >> >> was swap out the two Wicket versions. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> After I switched to Wicket1.4-m2, the page worked fine. > >> >> >> >> The page is now not being re-constructed at every request and > >> keeps > >> >> >> state > >> >> >> >> as expected. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> So, my problem is solved, but do you guys still want me to send > >> you > >> >> more > >> >> >> >> info? > >> >> >> >> I could switch back to m3 and send to the URLs that are being > >> >> generated > >> >> >> >> (Igor and Jeremy asked for that). > >> >> >> >> I could still try and add a link to the page under m3 and see > if > >> that > >> >> >> would > >> >> >> >> make a difference (Igor asked for that). > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Jeremy's question about accidentally constructing the page > >> myself > >> or > >> >> >> >> redirecting to it from my onSubmit() method has, I believe, > >> answered > >> >> >> itself > >> >> >> >> (no to both). > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> jWeekend, I assume you're talking about a Maven Quick Start - I > >> don't > >> >> >> use > >> >> >> >> Maven (I know, I know, I should) but if that's something that > >> can > >> be > >> >> >> done > >> >> >> >> quickly and for which you could give me a pointer or two, I can > >> try > >> >> to > >> >> >> do > >> >> >> >> it. If you're still interested, that is. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Let me know. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Thanks to each of you for the help, I appreciate it! > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> ilja > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Jeremy Thomerson < > >> >> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> Put a breakpoint in your constructor (sounds like you already > >> have) > >> >> and > >> >> >> >>> see what's calling it. Is it possible that you're constructing > >> the > >> >> page > >> >> >> >>> yourself (accidentally for a page link or something)? > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> Also - what's the URL after you submit the form? Are you > >> >> redirecting > >> >> >> to > >> >> >> >>> the page in your onSubmit? > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> Jeremy Thomerson > >> >> >> >>> http://www.wickettraining.com > >> >> >> >>> -- sent from a wireless device > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- > >> >> >> >>> From: Ilja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> >>> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 2:06 PM > >> >> >> >>> To: users@wicket.apache.org > >> >> >> >>> Subject: Re: Why is my page stateless, and how do I make it > >> >> stateful? > >> >> >> >>> (using Wicket 1.4-m3) > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> Hi Igor, thanks for the response. > >> >> >> >>> No, I don't mean when I press the refresh button. Here's > >> exactly > >> >> what > >> >> >> >>> happens: > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> - I type the URL into my browser. In my debugger, I can see > >> that > >> a > >> >> new > >> >> >> >>> page > >> >> >> >>> is constructed (the page constructor runs). > >> >> >> >>> - There is a form on the page. I type something into the form > >> >> >> (something > >> >> >> >>> that won't pass form validation). > >> >> >> >>> - I click on the form submit button. In my debugger, I can see > >> that > >> >> a > >> >> >> >>> whole > >> >> >> >>> new page is constructed (losing, of course, any state I had in > >> the > >> >> >> >>> previous > >> >> >> >>> page). > >> >> >> >>> - Even though a new page is constructed, the form is returned > >> to > >> me > >> >> >> with > >> >> >> >>> the > >> >> >> >>> values filled in and a validation error. > >> >> >> >>> I know this sounds very strange. But it's true, I've tested it > >> many > >> >> >> times. > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> The same thing happens when I fill in the form with values > that > >> will > >> >> >> pass > >> >> >> >>> validation: > >> >> >> >>> - When I click the form submit button, I can see in my > debugger > >> that > >> >> a > >> >> >> >>> whole > >> >> >> >>> new page is constructed, and THEN the onSubmit() method of my > >> form > >> >> is > >> >> >> >>> executed. Somehow, values filled into the form are retained > >> even > >> >> though > >> >> >> a > >> >> >> >>> whole new page was constructed. Other state in the page is > >> lost. > >> >> >> >>> Again, I know it sounds very strange. > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> I've tested some other pages in my application and they do not > >> show > >> >> >> this > >> >> >> >>> behavior. > >> >> >> >>> The only difference between this particular page and the other > >> pages > >> >> is > >> >> >> >>> that > >> >> >> >>> for each of the other pages, a user has to be logged into the > >> >> >> application. > >> >> >> >>> The page in question, on the other hand, is a publicly > >> accessible > >> >> page > >> >> >> for > >> >> >> >>> which you do not have to be logged in. However, I don't see > how > >> that > >> >> >> would > >> >> >> >>> result in the behavior I see. > >> >> >> >>> Also, the page in question uses PageParameters to receive some > >> >> initial > >> >> >> >>> values. But, again, I don't see how that would result in what > I > >> see. > >> >> >> >>> I've also tried to get some info by calling isStateless() on > >> the > >> >> page > >> >> >> but > >> >> >> >>> it > >> >> >> >>> returns null. > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> What else could I try/what other info could I collect? > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> Thanks for the help! > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> ilja > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Igor Vaynberg < > >> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> >> >>> >wrote: > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > a page with a form on it cannot be stateless. what do you > >> mean > >> >> >> >>> > reconstructing on every request? when you press the refresh > >> >> button? > >> >> >> >>> > that is because this is a bookmarkable url... > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > -igor > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Ilja < > >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> >>> wrote: > >> >> >> >>> > > Hi, > >> >> >> >>> > > I have a mounted, bookmarkable page with a form in it. > >> >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >> >>> > > My problem is that I want to keep state in the page. > >> However, > >> at > >> >> >> every > >> >> >> >>> > > request, the page is constructed anew and, obviously, I > >> lose > >> the > >> >> >> state > >> >> >> >>> > I'd > >> >> >> >>> > > like to keep. > >> >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >> >>> > > At the same time (and this mystifies me a little), form > >> >> components > >> >> >> >>> seem > >> >> >> >>> > to > >> >> >> >>> > > keep state between requests during validation (non-form > >> >> components, > >> >> >> >>> such > >> >> >> >>> > as > >> >> >> >>> > > Labels, which are also included in my form class, do not > >> keep > >> >> >> state). > >> >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >> >>> > > So, since the page is re-constructed at every request, am > I > >> >> dealing > >> >> >> >>> with > >> >> >> >>> > a > >> >> >> >>> > > stateless page (even though the form seems to keep some > >> state)? > >> >> >> >>> > > And how could I make that page stateful? > >> >> >> >>> > > (I've tried setting setStatelessHint(false) on the page > but > >> that > >> >> >> >>> doesn't > >> >> >> >>> > > make a difference). > >> >> >> >>> > > Why is the page stateless even though it has a stateful > >> >> component > >> >> >> (the > >> >> >> >>> > form) > >> >> >> >>> > > in it? > >> >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >> >>> > > I've scoured the Wiki and can't seem to find an answer to > >> this > >> >> >> >>> problem. > >> >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >> >>> > > Any thoughts would be appreciated! > >> >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >> >>> > > Thanks! > >> >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >> >>> > > ilja > >> >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> >> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> >> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Why-is-my-page-stateless%2C-and-how-do-I-make-it-stateful--%28using-Wicket-1.4-m3%29-tp20523463p20553131.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
