The API is pretty locked for now - only a significant bug found would cause
a change.  A significant bug is fairly unlikely considering that so many
people are running production apps against it already and the changes from
1.3 -> 1.4 were not many (functionally).

I don't know about a date for 1.4 at this time - Igor?  Frank / etc???

I just added a paragraph to the migration page regarding this change (
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migrate-1.4#Migrate-1.4-getModelnamechange
).

Hope this helps!

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com

On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Susan Liebeskind <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
>
>> 1.4-rc1 is safe to go with (my opinion - i have quite a few apps currently
>> deployed on various versions of 1.4 (m2 / m3 / and now rc1).
>>
>>
> So long as the interfaces are NOT likely to make major changes (where major
> = along the lines of the getModel -> getDefaultModel changeover), then I'm
> okay with going with 1.4-rc1. I also noticed that the QuickStart maven
> archetype works with 1.4-rc1 (it had problems with 1.4-m3 generics), so
> that's also a good sign that 1.4rc1 is stable.
>
> And let me ask: is there any more resolution on when 1.4 final will be out,
> given that RC1 is on the street? Or you just cannot predict a date at this
> time?
>
> You go on to describe problems with differences between 1.3 / 1.4 - what
>> errors are you specifically seeing?  I think everything is pretty well
>> documented, but something could be missed.  The biggest difference (other
>> than generics) was probably the getModel() -> getDefaultModel() change.
>>
>>
> The POM file needed some fixing up due to changes in the Spring library
> packaging - that was mentioned on the Wicket Migration page, so it was easy
> to resolve that.   It was the getModel->getDefaultModel change that took
> some digging to find out, and which wasn't on the migration page.
> If the powers that be could add something about the method name change to
> the current migration page, that would be very helpful to others who will be
> migrating from 1.3.  I'm feeling a bit too new to the game to feek
> comfortable updating the page (and that would also be making the assumption
> that folks other than committers can add to the Wiki which I haven't yet
> tried to do).
>
> Start a new thread for the errors you are seeing and we will help.
>>
>>
>
> Thanks. I know I can get rid of the compiler errors on my own (20+ uses of
> the older get/setModel to replace), so I'm not too worried about that.
>
> But do you have a sense of any best practices/metaphors new for 1.4?  I
> don't see anything new on the wiki for 1.4 on the best practices page and
> that's a more subtle issue when it comes to working with the newer release -
> how should I be coding differently, if at all, now that we have this
> genericized framework?  Should I start a new thread about best practices for
> 1.4?
>
> Thanks again.
>
>
> Susan
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to