Yes Adriano, that's what I said on my last reply. :-)
>> So, the only way, for now, to have type-safety is using that
Class-thing. I don't vote for this though. A simple class with String
constants does de job quite well. :-D
Cheers,
Bruno
Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Bruno Borges escreveu:
Note that this is really type-safe, and these classes will never be
instantiated.
I don't think this has any value in this context. Where will the roles
x user will be? On the database, certainly...
So why declare dummy classes for them? If yon don't want to repeat
strings, you could create static final constants somewhere...
Adriano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
