I don't think its relevant for performance/memory, the overhead for dynamically creating a component for the label should be minmal. check out WicketMessageTagHandler to see the actual 'magic'
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Newgro <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi *, > > i investigate some alternatives to achieve same goal in wicket. > One i've found here > http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/general-i18n-in-wicket.html > > Exchanging the label components by wicket:messages has the advantage of less > code. > But is this relevant for performance and memory usage to? Has someone done > some > tests on this way already? > > I only want to be sure that effort of exchange is ok, if i decide to do it. > > Thanks for help > Per > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-worth-to-exchange-labels-by-wicket%3Amessage--tp21930543p21930543.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
