Yes Willis, that's what we do. So we prefer to have a generic BuukmarkablePageLink.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Willis Blackburn [mailto:wbo...@panix.com] Gesendet: Montag, 2. März 2009 13:43 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: Why is BookmarkablePageLink generified? BookmarkablePageLink isn't final. A subclass could use the model. W On Mar 2, 2009, at 7:36 AM, Erik van Oosten wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering why BookmarkablePageLink has been generified. A > bookmarkable link has no use for a model as far as I can see. > > Shall I create an issue to change the declaration of > BookmarkablePageLink from: > public class BookmarkablePageLink<T> extends Link<T> > to > public class BookmarkablePageLink extends Link<Void> > ? > > Regards, > Erik. > > -- > Erik van Oosten > http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org