Hi, sounds interesting. What would you say are the advantages of terracotta over memcached? I'd say in terms of scalability terracotty has the same disadvantages like local (in-jvm) caches - replication has to be done to all other nodes.
Thanx for your thoughts, cheers, Martin On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 23:25 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > You can check the TIM integration work from the Terracotta guys. That > should make things easier, and you could even try it out, perhaps > saving a memcached implementation completely :) > > Martijn > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Martin Grotzke > <martin.grot...@javakaffee.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > we're just thinking about a session store using memcached. I just want > > to ask if somebody already implemented this (and wants to share) before > > we implement this. > > > > Btw, is there some documentation about ISessionStore semantics, in > > addition to javadocs? I would be interested in the order in which the > > different methods would be invoked. > > > > Thanx && cheers, > > Martin > > > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
