On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Kaspar Fischer <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. Is it correct that there are two variants of the pattern? > > In one variant there is a single transaction (and a single session) that > gets committed at the end of the request, as described in [1]. If I am not > mistaken, James's wicket-advanced application [5] also uses this variant.
My example doesn't use that pattern (called transaction-per-request). The OSIV filter in my example merely opens the session. I rely on @Transactional methods to begin/commit transactions for me. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
