> [ ] -1, don't accept above resolution, because ...
What's in a name? Will it make Wicket more stable or feature-rich?


On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Martijn Dashorst <dasho...@apache.org>wrote:

> The Wicket PMC has discussed the following action. Because I think it
> is prudent that the Wicket community keeps evolving with the state of
> Java, I've created a board resolution to rename Wicket to WicketFX
> (thanks Igor for the suggestion!)
>
> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests
> of the Foundation and the Apache Wicket community to rename Apache
> Wicket to Apache WicketFX to get presentation slots at the JavaOne
> conference, and make it easier to obtain JSR status.
>
> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the project formerly known as the
> "Apache Wicket" project, be and hereby is renamed to "Apache
> WicketFX"; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache WicketFX PMC be and hereby is responsible to
> submit or propose new presentations and tutorials to the JavaOne
> Conference concerning Wicket and FX; and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the Apache WicketFX PMC be and hereby is responsible to
> submit the Apache WicketFX project to the JCP and obtain JSR status;
> and be it further
>
> RESOLVED, that the original Apache Wicket PMC be and hereby is
> dissolved of its responsibilities for this day, April 1st, 2009.
>
> [ ] +1, accept above resolution
> [ ] -1, don't accept above resolution, because ...
>
> This vote runs for just today, otherwise we won't be able to get it
> accepted by the board this month.
>
> Martijn
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Mikhail Fursov

Reply via email to