oh really? :)
2009/4/2 nino martinez wael <[email protected]>: > In case you did not know, april fools :) > > 2009/4/1 nino martinez wael <[email protected]>: >> In theory yes, but we would require Wicket to abstract all classes via >> interfaces and make WASP and SWARM to rely on those instead.. Since >> the byte code signature are not identical for the code.. >> >> 2009/4/1 Johan Compagner <[email protected]>: >>> Will WASP and SWARM run on WASMP? >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:32, nino martinez wael < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Guys >>>> >>>> Im happy to announce the new Shiny Wicket Assembler Project on behalf >>>> of the WASMP team. Do you need speed? Then WASMP is for you, in it's >>>> first release it will be able to run on a 386 system and are written >>>> for DOS 3. Initial tests (on the pre alpha release) states that this >>>> out runs a comparative Wicket Java system on a brand new 4 GHZ 4 core >>>> intel system. >>>> >>>> We are using native classes (Assembler thru C) to provide these >>>> performance boots. >>>> >>>> Stay tuned for more information! >>>> >>>> -The WASMP Team >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
