Ahh, now I know. I just need to make FormSubmittingCheckBox implements
IFormSubmittingComponent and then checkBox.add(new
AjaxFormSubmitBehavior("onchange")).Yippee! ** Martin 2009/2/13 Timo Rantalaiho <timo.rantala...@ri.fi>: > On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Martin Makundi wrote: >> Yes, this is what I am trying to do, but disabling and enabling a >> textfield ends up clearing its value too if I use >> AjaxFormSumitBehavior. Don't know why. > > Maybe a conversion error that prohibits updating the model? > Though in the case of validation or conversion errors the > erroneous input could be preserved... but maybe the Ajax > update gets it from the model anyway? > > 0) raw input > 1) convert -> if succeeds, convertedInput > 2) validate -> if succeeds, model > > Do you have a feedback panel on the page? > > By debugging Form.process() you can probably see easily > what's going on. > >> I feel it is more consistent to use just plain Wicket. > > In a way, yes, but sometimes purely client-side stuff can be > easier purely on the client-side. > > Best wishes, > Timo > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
