ya i guess they are mostly for rich internet applications use.First thing I'd have to work on is to have tight with integration with a specific javascript framework.
Wonder how gmail does it. Offline gmail simply is the best. On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Ryan Gravener <r...@ryangravener.com>wrote: > I would just make an adobe air application for offline use. > > > Ryan Gravener > http://isithotinhereorisitjust.me | http://twitter.com/ryangravener > > > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Jeremy Thomerson < > jer...@wickettraining.com > > wrote: > > > I haven't looked into Gears at great length, but I think you may be up > > against a wall here - where the two may be incompatible. Offline > > gears applications require fat clients. Wicket isn't typically for > > making fat clients because everything about it ties it back to the > > server. > > > > If you already have it such that each office has their own server and > > database, then it seems that this isn't a product development problem > > so much as it's a network support issue. How often should the network > > within an office really be down? I'd try to push this problem back up > > the management chain. > > > > Conceptually, it's a cool idea, though. Let us know if you have any > > success. > > > > -- > > Jeremy Thomerson > > http://www.wickettraining.com > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Carlo Camerino <cmcamer...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Is there any project which has Wicket And Google Gears Integration? > > > Wicket has really done a lot of us in speeding up development time. > > Coming > > > from a struts we saw the power of Wicket in terms its reusability and > > i've > > > noticed that > > > wicket already did most of the tasks that we would have to manually do > > using > > > struts application, like session timeouts, redirects, etc.... > > > > > > One of our main concerns however are that clients > > > are asking for our applications to be available even if the network is > > down > > > or if the central server is down.. > > > Currently we implemented our applications in a distributed fashion > > wherein > > > every branch ( Remote Location) has its own server. > > > However, this has implications of cost and administration issues. > > > However, if offline mode is enabled we can just begin syncing right. > > > > > > I think that Wicket WIth Google Gears Application will make it even > > better . > > > > > > > > > I think this is really a plus when it comes to marketing it to > customers. > > > Most of the applications that we create our banking applications and > any > > > downtime is costing our clients. > > > > > > Hopefully we can also do this to offload the central servers and to put > > > processing into client machines. > > > > > > One large problem I see though is that most code wil have to be moved > to > > the > > > Browser Layer. > > > I'm thinking of how to create a wicket application which is mostly run > by > > > java classes work on the client side. > > > Looks as if there will be a lot of code changes... > > > I'm not really sure if it would be a totally different programming > model. > > > > > > Anyone out there tried to integrate Gears And Wicket > > > > > > Carlo > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > >
