thats however development cost must be high (thats star high, not sky high), since you have to implement all things your own way. But then why use wicket? You could just do your own thing there too...
2009/6/10 nino martinez wael <[email protected]>: > In some sense it gives reason.. If you use something thats not > mainstream then the chance to get hacked are less. How development > cost must be high. > > 2009/6/10 Dorothée Giernoth <[email protected]>: >> No, worse, my boss :( he doesn't think tomcat is safe enough and doesn't >> know how tomcat works and what's going on behind the scenes ... and we can't >> have that!!!! I bet he won't let me use wicket ... b/c it's not safe enough >> either *shakes head* weirdo!!!! Paranoid? I bet ... >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: James Carman [mailto:[email protected]] >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Juni 2009 14:44 >> An: [email protected] >> Betreff: Re: AW: wicket on java server >> >> Sounds like a very strange request. Government? >> >> On Jun 10, 2009 8:37 AM, "Dorothée Giernoth" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> It is not my choice ... I just have to make it work, so I thought there are >> certain specifications that would make it work. >> >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[email protected]] >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Juni 2009 11:45 >> >> An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: wicket on java server Instead of >> writing your own server, ... >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
