yep, that was my idea too even if this force me to introduce
supplementary navigations link outside the Slideshow. This may result
confusing for the user and they will not be as cool as normal
smoothgallery controls.

Anyway, is a cheap and effective solution so probably I go with this,
and I Will try to have a look in the SG forum for people having this
issue.

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:05 PM, nino martinez
wael<nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> just make an ajax version and use normal pagination..?
>
> 2009/7/2 Daniele Dellafiore <ilde...@gmail.com>:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Johannes
>> Schneider<maili...@cedarsoft.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks for that hint.
>>> Do you know how many images wicket-slides/SmoothGallery support? I will
>>> have galleries with thousands of pictures...
>>
>> I do not know how many images it supports but I remember it was quite
>> slow to load one hundred images.
>> Anyway, send all images to the client in one shot doesn't sound
>> reasonable to me.
>>
>> I am addressing this issue in the next weeks, if you have some ideas
>> we should start talking about some possible implementation.
>>
>> --
>> Daniele Dellafiore
>> http://blog.ildella.net
>> http://twitter.com/ildella
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>



-- 
Daniele Dellafiore
http://blog.ildella.net
http://twitter.com/ildella

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to