On 26 jul 2009, at 22:59, Alex Objelean wrote:

If you think this would help, then you could remove InvalidUrlException and invalidate the jira RFE created by me... I don't think this would heart
anyone...
Intresting, I assume that it is of value to have this construction, could you give me the link to the RFE ?

At any time, somehing was a WicketRuntimeException and only a PageExpired (original or as cause) is now rethrown. All others are wrapped. Is there a case that in the AbstractRequestCycleProcessor the following works then ?

            else if (e instanceof AuthorizationException)
              {
// are authorization exceptions always thrown

Kind Regards,

Olger


Alex


igor.vaynberg wrote:

my point is that this case is on the fence.

it is an invalid url, and it is a security violation. so which one
should take precendence?

my other concern is that we would have to maintain a long list of
exceptions that should be passed through, which becomes a pita.

-igor

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Alex Objelean<alex_objel...@yahoo.com >
wrote:

I just want to remind the reason why the InvalidUrlException was
introduced:
to avoid situations when user would tweak somehow the url and get the
InternalError Page...  I introduced a request for enhancement for
InvalidUrlException feature and if there are any problems related to it,
you
can blame me..:(

Alex Objelean


igor.vaynberg wrote:

then we are getting in a debate of what use an invalidurlexception
really is. if we forward page expired and a bunch of other exceptions,
why do we even need an invalidurlexception...

the point is the user has submitted a form that they should not have
been able to, it is an invalid url...

i dont know off the top of my head what the best approach is.

-igor

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Olger Warnier<ol...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
Hi Igor,

if the form is disabled why is it allowed to be submitted?

In a test you can ;)
When you know what to submit, it is possible to submit those values
without
a page, although I can imagine that it is quite hard to achieve due to
the
way wicket handles form variables and stuff (via the session).

Even with that in mind, I wonder if it is possible to have  the
UnauthorizedException thrown directly (without the
InvalidUrlException).

Kind Regards,

Olger


-igor

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Olger Warnier<ol...@xs4all.nl>
wrote:

Hi Developers,

Slowly but surely I move through the tests of the wicket security
framework.
In one test, the SecureFormTest, i ran into some strange behaviour.
It starts with an exception like this:
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.InvalidUrlException:
org.apache.wicket.authorization.UnauthorizedActionException:
Component
[MarkupContainer [Component id = form]] does not permit action ENABLE

(note, the test is commented in order to prevent build failures)

There is a secureform that has no rights to be filled an submitted.
Normal
behaviour till now was the return of a login page. In some cases I
found
the
return of the UnauthorizedActionException - all fine till now.
(running
1.4-rc7)
In this test though, I there is no redirection to a Login Page and I
can't
catch the UnauthorizedActionException. This started my quest into the
originating throws, this happens to be the throw of an
InvalidUrlException
in WebRequestCycleProcessor (line 248 and on)

              catch (WicketRuntimeException e)
              {
// we need to let page expired exception sift
through
instead of covering it up

                      if (e instanceof PageExpiredException)
                      {
                              throw e;
                      }
                      else if (e.getCause() instanceof
PageExpiredException)
                      {
                              throw e;
                      }
                      else
                      {
                              throw new InvalidUrlException(e);
                      }
              }

The UnauthorizedActionException is catched here and thereafter thrown
wrapped in an InvalidUrlException.

This is not the end of it, the RequestCycle catches this exception
and
has
some logic for it  (line 1337 starting) :

              catch (RuntimeException e)
              {
                      /*
* check if the raised exception wraps an abort
exception. if so, it is probably wise to
                       * unwrap and rethrow the abort exception
                       */
                      Throwable cause = e.getCause();
                      while (cause != null)
                      {
if (cause instanceof AbortException)
                              {
throw ((AbortException)cause);
                              }
                              cause = cause.getCause();
                      }
                      if (!handlingException)
                      {
                              // set step manually to handle
exception
                              handlingException = true;

                              // probably our last chance the
exception
can
be logged.
// Note that a PageExpiredException
should
not be logged, because
                              // it's not an internal error
                              if (!(e instanceof
PageExpiredException))
                              {
                                      logRuntimeException(e);
                              }

                              // try to play nicely and let the
request
processor handle the
// exception response. If that doesn't
work,
any runtime exception
// will automatically be bubbled up
                              if (processor != null)
                              {
processor.respond(e, this);
                              }
                      }
                      else..........

The exception runs through the cause loop, ending with a null cause,
and
continues to be logged and thereafter triggers a
processor.respond(e,this)
based on the InvalidUrlException.

This one is catched by the AbstractRequestCycleProcessor, doing the
following (line 116 and on):

              final Application application = Application.get();
              final IExceptionSettings settings =
application.getExceptionSettings();
              final Page responsePage =
requestCycle.getResponsePage();

Page override = onRuntimeException(responsePage, e);
              if (override != null)
              {
throw new RestartResponseException(override);
              }
              else if (e instanceof AuthorizationException)
              {
// are authorization exceptions always thrown
before
the real
                      // render?
// else we need to make a page (see below) or
set
it
hard to a
                      // redirect.
Class<? extends Page> accessDeniedPageClass =
application.getApplicationSettings()
                              .getAccessDeniedPage();

                      throw new
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(accessDeniedPageClass);
              }
              else if (e instanceof PageExpiredException)
              {
Class<? extends Page> pageExpiredErrorPageClass
=
application.getApplicationSettings()
                              .getPageExpiredErrorPage();

As you can see, this class expects a AuthorizationException, but the
"e"
in
question is an InvalidUrlException with as cause a
UnauthorizedActionException.

I could fix this in wicket-security by checking the
InvalidUrlExceptions
somehow ( I assume using the onRuntimeException) for this cause and
redirect
to a unauthorized page, access denied page (or something), but I'd
like
to
see what the best option is here.

1) WebRequestCycleProcessor does not rethrow the
WicketRuntimeException
in
all cases, why is that ?
Is it an option to rethrow when there is a unauthorized type of
exception
here ?
2) RequestCycle is doing nothing specific for this matter, so I
expect
no
changes here
3) AbstractRequestCycleProcessor checks for the authorization
exception,
it
seems to me that that will never come (it is rethrown as invalidurl
in
1)

Do I miss something here ?
If not, I would say that the UnAuthorizedExceptions should be
rethrown
as
such at the WebRequestCycleProcessor.

Kind Regards,

Olger









---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/UnauthorizedActionException-wrapped-in-an-InvalidUrlException--%3E-how-to-deal-with-it---tp24668942p24670188.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/UnauthorizedActionException-wrapped-in-an-InvalidUrlException--%3E-how-to-deal-with-it---tp24668942p24670421.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to