I think the HTML validator is not too well suited for unit tests in combination with WicketTester: their scope is different. That said, you can let WicketTester write the rendered HTML to files, and validate those files in a separate test, using the HTML validator stand-alone (not as a markup filter).
Martijn On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Andrea Aime<[email protected]> wrote: > Andrea Aime ha scritto: >> >> Hi, >> I've been using the wicketstuff XHTML validator to >> clean up all our app pages from validty issues. >> Great stuff, easy to use, good reporting. >> >> Now, I would feel more comfortable to have the XHTML >> validation embedded in unit tests as well, so that >> if a validation error pops in the tests will simply start >> to fail. >> >> However, it seems the filters are not executed in >> wicket tester. I looked a bit into the sources and >> it seems to be possible to rewrite the main class >> to turn it into a validation utility, but I'm not >> very comfortable doing that given it's Apache >> license and our source code base is GPL instead >> (would like to avoid mixing the Apache license >> in the sources, that is). > > Hmm... was wrong here, the validator is GPL'd. > Still, would be nice to avoid code duplication, > so still looking for nicer solutions > > Cheers > Andrea > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
