burnstone schrieb:
Type erasure would mean it can't, wouldn't it?

agreed, but i fear i might be missing something.

anyway, i tried with some testclasses to change a signature from
foo(Map<String, Object>) to
foo(Map<String, ?>)
without breaking existing code compiled against the first version.

so to me it looks like compatible.

cu uwe

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to