burnstone schrieb:
Type erasure would mean it can't, wouldn't it?
agreed, but i fear i might be missing something. anyway, i tried with some testclasses to change a signature from foo(Map<String, Object>) to foo(Map<String, ?>) without breaking existing code compiled against the first version. so to me it looks like compatible. cu uwe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org