heh, i was waiting for someone to say that. didnt take very long :) -igor
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Peter Ertl<[email protected]> wrote: >> recommendation for using Wicket, and regard it on par with the "industry >> standard" JSF. > > being on par with JSF is quite an insult *imho* :-) > > Am 02.09.2009 um 12:45 schrieb Rüdiger Schulz: > >> Hello everybody, >> >> the next issue of german Javamagazin (http://www.javamagazin.de/) has >> their >> title story about Wicket. It consists of two articles. One technical one, >> showing basic setup and principles of Wicket, and another about practical >> use of the framework. >> >> Despite constructive criticism (e.g. Wiki needs much better structuring to >> find anything useful, markup hierarchy and wicket:ids have to match Java >> code, without tool support for refactoring) they give a strong >> recommendation for using Wicket, and regard it on par with the "industry >> standard" JSF. >> >> So thumbs up to all of you Wicket devs, and hopefully this will lead to a >> little wider spreading of Wicket! >> >> >> >> greetings from Berlin, >> >> Rüdiger Schulz > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
