resolution -> solution...
Just set the ulimit in the initscript and run it with start-stop-daemon,
it will make the problem disappear (but still there would be many open
files...)

Peter

2009-10-21 00:38 keltezéssel, Major Péter írta:
> Hi,
> 
> we also had this issue, because (I think) we are running two different
> wicket application in only one glassfish domain. Our resolution was,
> that we are running now the glassfish domains with custom init scripts
> with ulimit settings. Maybe this will help for you.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Peter
> 
> 2009-10-21 00:14 keltezéssel, Martin Grigorov írta:
>> Hi Adam,
>>
>> You may try to debug what is the problem with
>> https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Java/JPicus
>>
>> El mar, 20-10-2009 a las 15:39 -0600, Adam Bender escribió:
>>> Greetings all,
>>>
>>> Recently I have been performance testing a Wicket application (1.4.1) and I
>>> am running into the dreaded Too Many Files Open issue. I have searched the
>>> mailing lists and most of the trouble around this issue seems to come from
>>> being in DEVELOPMENT mode so I made sure we were in DEPLOYMENT mode. When I
>>> run 'lsof -p xxxx | grep wicket-1.4.1.jar' I see over 1000 entries and it's
>>> growing monotonically. This seems really unusual - why would wicket need
>>> 1000 copies of this jar open? An additional bit of weirdness came up when
>>> our load tests stopped loading the embedded assets (css, js and images) in
>>> each page - this seemed to cap the number of lsof entries at 5... This is
>>> even weirder because our app serves these static items from httpd without
>>> tomcat ever knowing about them. How could our loading of embedded items
>>> really affect the number of file handles wicket needs?
>>>
>>> For completeness we are running this app on Red Hat Enterprise Linx 5 with
>>> Tomcat 6.0.20 and Java 1.6
>>>
>>> Adam

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to