are you opening the page in a new tab? this script is part of wicket
auto-multi-window support, it detects if the page has been opened in a
new tab and redirects to a url that will point to the same page but in
a new pagemap.

-igor

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Esteban Masoero
<emaso...@getsense.com.ar> wrote:
>
> First of all, thanks to all of you for your help.
> I haven't solved the problem, but I'm getting closer to it.
> (something like: new PageLink(new MyPage()); <= I checked it and I'm not
> doing that. )
>
> Here's what I've found out:
>
> After debugging a lot, I find out that TWO REQUESTS are made. The first one
> as a consecuence of the user asking for that page, and the second one
> because in that page the following script is added at the end of <head> tag:
> <script type="text/javascript" ><!--/*--><![CDATA[/*><!--*/
> if (window.name=='' || (window.name.indexOf('wicket') > -1 &&
> window.name!='wicket-wicket:default')) {
> window.location="?wicket:bookmarkablePage=wicket-6:ar.com.getsense.latamvalley.pages.LoginPage"
> + (window.location.hash != null ? window.location.hash : ""); }
> /*-->]]>*/</script>
>
> Can anyone tell me why is Wicket doing that? or what am I doing wrong?
>
>
> |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Here's the complete detailed description about what I am doing:
>
>        A UserStatusPanel that is always shown does *new Link("register")*
> with:
>       �...@override
>                public void onClick() {
>                        throw new
> RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException(UserRegistrationPage.class);
>                }
>
>        When the user gets to the page, submmits its registration data and
> the page sends an email with a link like:
> http://localhost:8080/ua?ua=2baab43f784b5b530b5347a50490bb0a
>
>
>        In my webApp, I've done:
>        this.mount(new QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy("/ua",
> UserActivationPage.class));
>
>        When the user goes to the previous mentioned link by a new tab, the
> following happens:
>
>        _______________________
>        GET /ua?ua=2e129db15b6d6db5342ba5d328642262 HTTP/1.1
>        Host: localhost:8080
>        ....
>        Connection: keep-alive
>        Cookie: JSESSIONID=78ehtk0o3y0w
>        _______________________________
>        === IN org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond() ===
>        --processor.processEvents(this);
>        ---- UserActivationPage is constructed, and the page activates the
> user
>        ---- UserActivationPage does: setResponsePage(LoginPage.class);
>        --processor.respond(this);
>        ----LoginPage is constructed (messages exists in session and are
> properly rendered to somewhere)
>        ===================================================================
>        [I can see in firebug that the correct response reaches the browser!]
>
>        Strangely, In the page, wicket adds:        <script
> type="text/javascript" ><!--/*--><![CDATA[/*><!--*/
> if (window.name=='' || (window.name.indexOf('wicket') > -1 &&
> window.name!='wicket-wicket:default')) {
> window.location="?wicket:bookmarkablePage=wicket-6:ar.com.getsense.latamvalley.pages.LoginPage"
> + (window.location.hash != null ? window.location.hash : ""); }
> /*-->]]>*/</script>
>
>        [So a new request is made!]
>        ___________________________________________
>        GET
> /ua?wicket:bookmarkablePage=wicket-6:ar.com.getsense.latamvalley.pages.LoginPage
> HTTP/1.1
>        Host: localhost:8080
>        ...
>        Connection: keep-alive
>        Referer: http://localhost:8080/ua?ua=2e129db15b6d6db5342ba5d328642262
>        Cookie: JSESSIONID=78ehtk0o3y0w
>        ________________________________________________
>        === IN org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.processEventsAndRespond() ===
>        --processor.processEvents(this);
>        ---- LoginPage is constructed (not UserActivationPage like it did
> before) (this time, messages from the session are gonne)
>        --processor.respond(this); finally this page is shown without my
> messages :(
>        ===================================================================
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
> Esteban
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Martin Grigorov escribió:
>>
>> El mar, 20-10-2009 a las 15:04 -0700, Douglas Ferguson escribió:
>>
>>>
>>> You can also check your html to make sure there aren't any urls that
>>>  would get loaded by the browser.
>>>
>>> i.e. <link>, <img>, etc tags..
>>>
>>
>> yeah, <img src="" ... /> will make a second request to the page. quite
>> nasty!
>> fortunately there is a checker for these kind of problems in
>> wicket-devutils project
>>
>>>
>>> D/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 20, 2009, at 4:39 PM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Have you followed the suggestions in this thread?
>>>>
>>>> First, put a breakpoint to see what's instantiating the page - the  most
>>>> likely suspect for an unintended additional instantiation is a bad
>>>>  link,
>>>> something like: new PageLink(new MyPage());   <--- shouldn't do that
>>>>
>>>> If it's Wicket code, what code is it?  Why?  It might be stateless as
>>>> Martijn suggested.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jeremy Thomerson
>>>> http://www.wickettraining.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Esteban Ignacio Masoero <
>>>> emaso...@getsense.com.ar> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi there. I'm bringing to life this old thread to ask whether this
>>>>>  issue
>>>>> was
>>>>> solved and how, because I'm experiencing something alike, which makes
>>>>> session messsages to get lost ("consummed" by the first instance of
>>>>>  the
>>>>> page), and consecuently not shown by the second page instance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Esteban
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Vinayak Borkar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Martijn,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok. I set the getStatelessHint() to return false.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now I get java.lang.IllegalStateException: No SessionHandler or
>>>>>> SessionManager
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the reason that wicket needs to instantiate the page  twice? I
>>>>>> can understand the second instantiation, but my guess is that the
>>>>>>  first
>>>>>> instantiation is not to render the HTML.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I am correct about my analysis above, is there some way I can  know
>>>>>> that the instantiation does not need to populate all the components?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vinayak
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your page is stateless, which is a holy grail for most to attend.  Be
>>>>>>> happy :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since it is stateless, Wicket has to construct the page with each
>>>>>>> request, until it is no longer stateless.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you have a form, override its getstatelesshint method and return
>>>>>>> false.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Vinayak Borkar <vbo...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jeremy,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I did that. The first time it is
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.BookmarkableListenerInterfaceRequestTarget.processEvents
>>>>> (BookmarkableListenerInterfaceRequestTarget.java:127)
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and the second time it is
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.wicket.request.target.component.BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.processEvents
>>>>> (BookmarkablePageRequestTarget.java:223)
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does that help?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Vinayak
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Run it in debug mode, put a breakpoint in your constructor and  see
>>>>>>>>> what's
>>>>>>>>> instantiating each.  A lot of times it is your own code (a bad
>>>>>>>>>  link,
>>>>>>>>> etc).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Jeremy Thomerson
>>>>>>>>> http://www.wickettraining.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Vinayak Borkar  <vbo...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have a form that performs a search and shows a page with
>>>>>>>>>>  results.
>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>> result page also has the same form to do a repeat search. I
>>>>>>>>>>  noticed
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> SearchPage is instantiated twice when I do a search from the  form
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> result page. Is there a way to make sure that does not happen?
>>>>>>>>>>  The
>>>>>>>>>> search
>>>>>>>>>> page ends up doing the search twice.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Vinayak
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Page-instantiated-twice- tp22799162p25982806.html
>>>>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to