search this list, google it. this has been answered on this list multiple times.
-igor
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Pamir Erdem <pamir.er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could you please send me a link that how i can achieve this over wicket ?
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> well, its either we lock on the page, or you have to make sure all
>> your code is threadsafe.
>>
>> yes, this can be a problem for a lot of concurrent ajax requests, you
>> just have to make sure your responses are fast. eg if you have a
>> time-consuming operation do it in a background thread and make ajax
>> calls poll instead of block.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Pamir Erdem <pamir.er...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > There are parts in web which make ajax calls. In this situtation on
>> request
>> > blocks the piece of code till it returns a value. Do you recommend
>> anything
>> > about ajax calls in a web page?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Pamir
>> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> can you submit a quickstart that reproduces this?
>> >>
>> >> the lock on session only blocks concurrent requests from the browser,
>> >> which is usually not a big deal because most users operate one window
>> >> at a time.
>> >>
>> >> also we do not get the same results in our wicket-threadtest project.
>> >>
>> >> -igor
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Pamir Erdem <pamir.er...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > From wicket source code WebRequestCycleProcessor has a lock on
>> session.
>> >> > (Look at the source code below).
>> >> > From a profiler we can easily observe that %57 of the time is spent on
>> >> this
>> >> > function especially on lock region.
>> >> > Is there any way to speed it up this source code ?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > /**
>> >> > * @see
>> >> >
>> >>
>> org.apache.wicket.request.IRequestCycleProcessor#resolve(org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle,
>> >> > * org.apache.wicket.request.RequestParameters)
>> >> > */
>> >> > public IRequestTarget resolve(final RequestCycle requestCycle,
>> >> > final RequestParameters requestParameters)
>> >> > {
>> >> > IRequestCodingStrategy requestCodingStrategy =
>> >> requestCycle.getProcessor()
>> >> > .getRequestCodingStrategy();
>> >> >
>> >> > final String path = requestParameters.getPath();
>> >> > IRequestTarget target = null;
>> >> >
>> >> > // See whether this request points to a bookmarkable page
>> >> > if (requestParameters.getBookmarkablePageClass() != null)
>> >> > {
>> >> > target = resolveBookmarkablePage(requestCycle, requestParameters);
>> >> > }
>> >> > // See whether this request points to a rendered page
>> >> > else if (requestParameters.getComponentPath() != null)
>> >> > {
>> >> > // marks whether or not we will be processing this request
>> >> > boolean processRequest = true;
>> >> > synchronized (requestCycle.getSession())
>> >> > {
>> >> > // we need to check if this request has been flagged as
>> >> > // process-only-if-path-is-active and if so make sure this
>> >> > // condition is met
>> >> > if (requestParameters.isOnlyProcessIfPathActive())
>> >> > {
>> >> > // this request has indeed been flagged as
>> >> > // process-only-if-path-is-active
>> >> >
>> >> > Session session = Session.get();
>> >> > IPageMap pageMap =
>> >> > session.pageMapForName(requestParameters.getPageMapName(),
>> >> > false);
>> >> > if (pageMap == null)
>> >> > {
>> >> > // requested pagemap no longer exists - ignore this
>> >> > // request
>> >> > processRequest = false;
>> >> > }
>> >> > else if (pageMap instanceof AccessStackPageMap)
>> >> > {
>> >> > AccessStackPageMap accessStackPageMap =
>> (AccessStackPageMap)pageMap;
>> >> > if (accessStackPageMap.getAccessStack().size() > 0)
>> >> > {
>> >> > final Access access =
>> (Access)accessStackPageMap.getAccessStack()
>> >> > .peek();
>> >> >
>> >> > final int pageId = Integer
>> >> > .parseInt(Strings.firstPathComponent(requestParameters
>> >> > .getComponentPath(), Component.PATH_SEPARATOR));
>> >> >
>> >> > if (pageId != access.getId())
>> >> > {
>> >> > // the page is no longer the active page
>> >> > // - ignore this request
>> >> > processRequest = false;
>> >> > }
>> >> > else
>> >> > {
>> >> > final int version = requestParameters.getVersionNumber();
>> >> > if (version != Page.LATEST_VERSION &&
>> >> > version != access.getVersion())
>> >> > {
>> >> > // version is no longer the active version -
>> >> > // ignore this request
>> >> > processRequest = false;
>> >> > }
>> >> > }
>> >> > }
>> >> > }
>> >> > else
>> >> > {
>> >> > // TODO also this should work..
>> >> > }
>> >> > }
>> >> > }
>> >> > if (processRequest)
>> >> > {
>> >> > try
>> >> > {
>> >> > target = resolveRenderedPage(requestCycle, requestParameters);
>> >> > }
>> >> > catch (IgnoreAjaxRequestException e)
>> >> > {
>> >> > target = EmptyAjaxRequestTarget.getInstance();
>> >> > }
>> >> > }
>> >> > else
>> >> > {
>> >> > throw new PageExpiredException("Request cannot be processed");
>> >> > }
>> >> > }
>> >> > // See whether this request points to a shared resource
>> >> > else if (requestParameters.getResourceKey() != null)
>> >> > {
>> >> > target = resolveSharedResource(requestCycle, requestParameters);
>> >> > }
>> >> > // See whether this request points to the home page
>> >> > else if (Strings.isEmpty(path) || ("/".equals(path)))
>> >> > {
>> >> > target = resolveHomePageTarget(requestCycle, requestParameters);
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> > // NOTE we are doing the mount check as the last item, so that it
>> will
>> >> > // only be executed when everything else fails. This enables URLs
>> like
>> >> > // /foo/bar/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=my.Page to be resolved, where
>> >> > // is either a valid mount or a non-valid mount. I (Eelco) am not
>> >> > // absolutely sure this is a great way to go, but it seems to have
>> been
>> >> > // established as the default way of doing things. If we ever want to
>> >> > // tighten the algorithm up, it should be combined by going back to
>> >> > // unmounted paths so that requests with Wicket parameters like
>> >> > // 'bookmarkablePage' are always created and resolved in the same
>> >> > // fashion. There is a test for this in UrlMountingTest.
>> >> > if (target == null)
>> >> > {
>> >> > // still null? check for a mount
>> >> > target = requestCodingStrategy.targetForRequest(requestParameters);
>> >> >
>> >> > if (target == null && requestParameters.getComponentPath() != null)
>> >> > {
>> >> > // If the target is still null and there was a component path
>> >> > // then the Page could not be located in the session
>> >> > throw new PageExpiredException(
>> >> > "Cannot find the rendered page in session [pagemap=" +
>> >> > requestParameters.getPageMapName() + ",componentPath=" +
>> >> > requestParameters.getComponentPath() + ",versionNumber=" +
>> >> > requestParameters.getVersionNumber() + "]");
>> >> > }
>> >> > }
>> >> > else
>> >> > {
>> >> > // a target was found, but not by looking up a mount. check whether
>> >> > // this is allowed
>> >> > if (Application.get().getSecuritySettings().getEnforceMounts() &&
>> >> > requestCodingStrategy.pathForTarget(target) != null)
>> >> > {
>> >> > String msg = "Direct access not allowed for mounted targets";
>> >> > // the target was mounted, but we got here via another path
>> >> > // : deny the request
>> >> > log.error(msg + " [request=" + requestCycle.getRequest() +
>> ",target="
>> >> +
>> >> > target +
>> >> > ",session=" + Session.get() + "]");
>> >> > throw new
>> >> > AbortWithWebErrorCodeException(HttpServletResponse.SC_FORBIDDEN, msg);
>> >> > }
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> > // (WICKET-1356) in case no target was found, return null here.
>> >> > RequestCycle will deal with it
>> >> > // possible letting wicket filter to pass the request down the filter
>> >> > chain
>> >> > /*
>> >> > if (target == null)
>> >> > {
>> >> > // if we get here, we have no recognized Wicket target, and thus
>> >> > // regard this as a external (non-wicket) resource request on
>> >> > // this server
>> >> > return resolveExternalResource(requestCycle);
>> >> > }
>> >> > */
>> >> >
>> >> > return target;
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Pamir Erdem
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Pamir Erdem
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Pamir Erdem
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
