Pierre Goupil wrote:
> 
> I use it, and what I'm looking for is a mean to ensure my test coverage.
> 

If you're using TDD, you will have developed the page and the unit test for
that 
page at the same time and by definition you won't have a page that is not 
tested.

-----
--
Kent Tong
Better way to unit test Wicket pages (http://wicketpagetest.sourceforge.net)
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Wicket-tester-test-coverage-tp26505428p26509669.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to