Pierre Goupil wrote: > > I use it, and what I'm looking for is a mean to ensure my test coverage. > If you're using TDD, you will have developed the page and the unit test for that page at the same time and by definition you won't have a page that is not tested. ----- -- Kent Tong Better way to unit test Wicket pages (http://wicketpagetest.sourceforge.net) -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Wicket-tester-test-coverage-tp26505428p26509669.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
- Wicket tester test coverage Pierre Goupil
- Re: Wicket tester test coverage Kent Tong
- Re: Wicket tester test coverage Pierre Goupil
- Re: Wicket tester test coverage Jeremy Thomerson
- Re: Wicket tester test coverage Daan van Etten
- Re: Wicket tester test coverage Kent Tong
- Re: Wicket tester test coverage Pierre Goupil
- Re: Wicket tester test coverage ZedroS Schwart
- Re: Wicket tester test coverage Kent Tong
- Re: Wicket tester test coverage ZedroS Schwart
- Re: Wicket tester test coverage Kent Tong
- Re: Wicket tester test coverage ZedroS Schwart
- Re: Wicket tester test coverage Martijn Dashorst
- Re: Wicket tester test coverage Daan van Etten
- Re: Wicket tester test coverage Pierre Goupil
- Re: Wicket tester test coverage Daan van Etten
