If refactoring is not supported it is just easier to use string
constants, which do not break.

**
Martin

2009/11/26 Gerolf Seitz <gerolf.se...@gmail.com>:
> as far as i have read, the binding "methods" aren't automatically refactored
> (eg. renamed),
> but you get compiler errors in the code where you use the "old names". so it
> should be
> fairly easy to fix your own code (in contrast to some strings)
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Giambalvo, Christian <
> christian.giamba...@excelsisnet.com> wrote:
>
>> Is refactoring available for bindgen?
>>
>> -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. November 2009 22:56
>> An: users@wicket.apache.org; d...@wicket.apache.org
>> Betreff: PropertyModels *without* strings
>>
>>
>> http://wicketinaction.com/2009/11/removing-fragile-string-expressions-from-wicket-code/
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to