If refactoring is not supported it is just easier to use string constants, which do not break.
** Martin 2009/11/26 Gerolf Seitz <gerolf.se...@gmail.com>: > as far as i have read, the binding "methods" aren't automatically refactored > (eg. renamed), > but you get compiler errors in the code where you use the "old names". so it > should be > fairly easy to fix your own code (in contrast to some strings) > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Giambalvo, Christian < > christian.giamba...@excelsisnet.com> wrote: > >> Is refactoring available for bindgen? >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. November 2009 22:56 >> An: users@wicket.apache.org; d...@wicket.apache.org >> Betreff: PropertyModels *without* strings >> >> >> http://wicketinaction.com/2009/11/removing-fragile-string-expressions-from-wicket-code/ >> >> -igor >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
