But leaving IPageLink without any classes using it seems a bit weird to me. I think IPageLink should be removed with PageLink and probably be moved to wicket-security.
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 11:36:59 Jeroen Steenbeeke wrote: > Which is what I suggested earlier in this discussion as well. So long > as nobody touches the IPageLink interface then simply adapting > SecurePageLink to use IPageLink directly would work without any > significant break in SecurePageLink's API. That way there are no icky > constructors and no unnecessary link classes. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
