... touche? :) On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com>wrote:
> i thought they were all stored as electrons.... > > -igor > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM, James Carman > <jcar...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > > All data in Java is ultimately stored as some sort of primitive type. > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Jonathan Locke > > <jonathan.lo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> TimeUnit is icky and storing time values in primitive types is a bad > idea. > >> > >> > >> Alexandru Objelean wrote: > >>> > >>> I was wondering why would wicket need Duration class as long as java > >>> provides a similar TimeUnit. Maybe it would be a good idea to deprecate > >>> this > >>> class & encourage usage of TimeUnit? > >>> > >>> Alex Objelean > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Should-Duration-be-deprecated--tp27323675p27328738.html > >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
