Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > Nope. a <link> element can be closed by either <link></link> *or* > <link />. Both are valid X(HT)ML. >
You are absolutely right. Empty tags can be closed in both ways, just as you mentioned. So the validator should not complain. So its a bug in the tuckey validation guidelines? > Try it in the w3 validator... http://validator.w3.org > > Martijn > I am not able to test my app with w3c validator as it is not running on a public server yet. Or am I missing something? Richard -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/CSSPackageResource.getHeaderContribution---valid-xhtml-markup-tp27370082p27373294.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
