anybody want to work on this? i have my collection of wicket components and this is just the type of stuff id like to be included.
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 11:26 +0100, Per Lundholm wrote: > If you do that, you will be a hero. ;-) > > But why not, a component that handles all kinds of addresses in the world is > a typical joint effort. > > If it is in the drop-down of countries, then it is supported. If not your > country is supported, then contribute! > > /Per > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Chris Colman <chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com > > wrote: > > > I'm just wondering if anyone knows of a sample 'world address' entry > > form built using wicket. > > > > Ideally the data entry fields for the top level attributes: > > > > - world region > > - country > > - state/zone > > > > Would be drop down list boxes. The contents of any drop down (except the > > world region) would be dictated by the option(s) chosen in the drop down > > lists above it. Eg., if you change the country from Australia to USA > > then the state/zone drop down is populated with the US states. > > > > I was thinking of creating an interface for the data so that a generic > > world wide address form could be written to the interface but the > > implementation of the interface could be tailored to the way an > > individual app stores it's world data. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Per Lundholm [mailto:per.lundh...@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Friday, 29 January 2010 8:26 AM > > > To: users@wicket.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: functional testing > > > > > > We write tests first and use Wicket's built-in testing. > > > > > > It has some quirks so you may have to spend time with figuring out how > > to > > > click an AjaxCheckBox, for instance. > > > > > > The tests target the logic of the view, such as "when clicking here, > > that > > > other thing should be disabled". > > > > > > Good test coverage really pays off when you have 20 different webapps > > and > > > need to work some here and some there. > > > > > > /Per > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Kent Tong <k...@cpttm.org.mo> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > For functional testing, I'd suggest Selenium. > > > > > > > > For unit testing of Wicket pages, I'd suggest "Wicket Page Test" > > > > (http://wicketpagetest.sourceforge.net). > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > -- > > > > Kent Tong > > > > Better way to unit test Wicket pages ( > > > > http://wicketpagetest.sourceforge.net) > > > > Books on CXF, Axis2, Wicket, JSF (http://http://agileskills2.org) > > > > -- > > > > View this message in context: > > > > http://old.nabble.com/functional-testing-tp27278781p27301553.html > > > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
