yeah.. but if you are running functional tests against packaged software then verifications will be happening outside of the applications's vm. the stuff you sent, depends on overloading application objects in order to make hem testable in memory.
Douglas Ferguson mobile: 512.293.7279 office/fax: 512.462.0408 skype: stillrecording aim: DaAmericanRuse - http://www.linkedin.com/in/douglasferguson http://www.myspace.com/douglasferguson http://www.douglasferguson.us/ http://www.distilleryrecords.com/ http://www.stillrecording.com/ Join my mailing list: [email protected] ________________________________________ From: Martin Makundi [[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:11 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Selenium Testing - Dealing with unstable wicket path Hi! You can run selenium tests with junit. http://www.junit.org/node/23 ** Martin 2010/2/17 Douglas Ferguson <[email protected]>: > Hmm.. How would the example you sent apply to selenium tests? > > That seems like a unit test approach. > > Douglas Ferguson > > mobile: 512.293.7279 > office/fax: 512.462.0408 > skype: stillrecording > aim: DaAmericanRuse > > - > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/douglasferguson > http://www.myspace.com/douglasferguson > http://www.douglasferguson.us/ > http://www.distilleryrecords.com/ > http://www.stillrecording.com/ > > Join my mailing list: [email protected] > ________________________________________ > From: Martin Makundi [[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 9:55 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Selenium Testing - Dealing with unstable wicket path > > Hi! > > Maybe you can generate the path from the actual path? > > http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/type-safe-testing-in-wicket.html > > ** > Martin > > 2010/2/17 Douglas Ferguson <[email protected]>: >> I'm using the following xpath wtih regex.. >> >> and this works.. >> >> "xpath=//*[fn:matches(@wicketpath,'taskListContainer_taskTable_taskList_\\d')][2]" >> >> but this doesn't >> >> "xpath=//*[fn:matches(@wicketpath,'taskListContainer_taskTable_taskList_\\d_taskContainer_edit')][2]" >> >> any idea why? >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
