I was thinking that i could install the same application on each site, then have the databases synchronized somehow. My CTO will have me for lunch if i suggest this.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Frank Silbermann < [email protected]> wrote: > Any application that executes _offline_ is not a _web_ application -- > unless the system consists of a stand-alone application containing a web > server that runs on the client (e.g. via jetty) so that both client and > server are running on the same box. > > Theoretically, a Wicket application that runs on a jetty server on the > client could synchronize itself, when possible, via non-Wicket web > services that run on the server. > > But why go that route? I'd build just an ordinary stand-alone client > application, e.g. using Java WebStart and Swing, that could optionally > connect to the server. There's no need for Wicket on the server, since > the client would provide the user interface. (The client would have to > do that, if it were to be able to run stand-alone.) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Kamau [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 7:05 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Offline capable web application > > Hi guys; > > I am working on an application that i want to enable to work offline. I > want > to use wicket for this. Any ideas. I would like uses to fill and submit > forms even when working offline and then the data is synchronised later. > Is > it possible? all manner of suggestions/links are welcome. > > Regards. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
