How do you prevent developers from renaming fields on components.
That seems really dangerous.

i.e. what seems like a simple refactor to correct a spelling mistake could 
result in sessions not being deserialized.

D/

On Mar 6, 2010, at 11:10 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:

> not with java serialization afaik
> 
> -igor
> 
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Douglas Ferguson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I can't deal with removing fields or changing method 
>> signatures/implementations?
>> 
>> D/
>> 
>> On Mar 6, 2010, at 12:58 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>> 
>>> as long as all you do is add fields you are ok...
>>> 
>>> -igor
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Douglas Ferguson
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> So as long as the serial I'd is the same the classlader won't care the
>>>> fields don't match?
>>>> 
>>>> Douglas Ferguson
>>>> 512-293-7279
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 5, 2010, at 3:37 PM, "Igor Vaynberg" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> in the wicket code we override serial ids to 1, you should do the same
>>>>> in your code.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -igor
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Douglas Ferguson
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> I'm  considering a 0 downtime deployment but am concerned with the
>>>>>> amount of state in the wicket session.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is the scenario that concerns me.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 1) There are 2 tomcats running
>>>>>> 2) A change is made to a serializable object and the serial version
>>>>>> id is updated
>>>>>> 3) 1 tomcat instance is taken down for updating
>>>>>> 4) tomcat instance comes back up with new object and now tries to
>>>>>> update state from other tomcat and the wicket session has a
>>>>>> reference to the old version of the serializable.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 5, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> yes
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -igor
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Douglas Ferguson
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Has anybody had success with wicket using tomcat's session
>>>>>>>> replication?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> D/
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to