Stefan,

... and encapsulating JavaScript statements; the two main concerns I'd
imagine anyone making an integration between Wicket and a JavaScript
library has.

Regards - Cemal
jWeekend
OO & Java Technologies, Wicket
Consulting, Development, Training
http://jWeekend.com


On 26 March 2010 13:37, Stefan Lindner <lind...@visionet.de> wrote:
> This sounds exactly like the thing I'm looking for. A small and simple 
> framework for HeaderContribution.
>
> Stefan
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: ce...@jweekend.com [mailto:ce...@jweekend.com] Im Auftrag von Cemal 
> Bayramoglu
> Gesendet: Freitag, 26. März 2010 14:26
> An: users
> Betreff: Re: Wicket JavaScript Library Integration - A Common Base
>
> Uwe!
>
> I was thinking in terms of a simple core, of well defined and limited
> scope. It would provide a clear and well trodden way for people to
> integrate their favourite JavaScript libraries with Wicket in a
> consistent and effective, tried and tested way.
>
> As you say, there are always going to be potential complications
> whenever a single web page depends on more than one version of the
> same JavaScript libraries, or sometimes even when some libraries clash
> with other, (seemingly) unrelated ones. What I was proposing was not
> as a  solution to incompatibilities between such multiple
> dependencies. On the other hand, once we had the common base (that
> seems to have already attracted some interest and even potential
> development support here), an extension, optional for people who
> want/need it, could try to manage the versions and other causes of
> conflict you talk of, if I understand you correctly.
>
> I am a believer in keeping the core as simple and light as possible
> whilst still open (and designed for) potential enhancement with
> extended functionality.
>
> Regards - Cemal
> jWeekend
> OO & Java Technologies, Wicket
> Consulting, Development, Training
> http://jWeekend.com
>
> 2010/3/26 Uwe Schäfer <schae...@thomas-daily.de>:
>> Uwe Schäfer schrieb:
>>
>> Hi Cemal,
>>
>>>> I was thinking that it could possibly be sensible to have another
>>>> project where we abstract out the mechanisms wiQuery provides for
>>>> resources and JavaScript statements.
>>
>> to keep that topic alive: do you agree that providing a unified way for
>> component authors to contribute standard libs to the page, as well as
>> coordinating these dependencies on the page level is a primary goal of
>> creating this lib?
>>
>> cu uwe
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to