Well, it is not bad to tell people what you believe is right:) We are wicket 
programmers, aren't we? :) Feel good to say what I wanted to say and thanks for 
the initial JIRA idea


--- On Mon, 3/29/10, James Carman <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: James Carman <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: better way setting up ID for a Wicket component?
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Monday, March 29, 2010, 11:06 PM
> See...told you. :)
> 
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Igor Vaynberg 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
> > im letting you know. we dont need to litter the public
> api with such
> > trivial methods, the api has a large surface area as
> it is. i am sure
> > as you code more with wicket you will find another 30
> such trivial
> > methods that will be useful to you, this is what
> static imports are
> > for.
> >
> > -igor
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 6:18 PM, James Carman
> > <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > Perhaps.  File a JIRA report (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET)
> > > and ask for it as a "New Feature."  If the
> core developers don't like the
> > > idea, I'm sure they'll let you know. :)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:13 PM, David Chang
> <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Using an external helper should do the trick,
> but it feels not so
> > natural
> > >> as a convenince method as mentioned in my
> previous email.
> > >>
> > >> Would it be possible for such a method make
> its way into a future
> > release?
> > >>
> > >> Regards.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --- On Mon, 3/29/10, James Carman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > From: James Carman <[email protected]>
> > >> > Subject: Re: better way setting up ID
> for a Wicket component?
> > >> > To: [email protected]
> > >> > Date: Monday, March 29, 2010, 9:07 PM
> > >> > You could make your own helper method
> > >> > that sets both to the same thing and
> > >> > returns the component.  Just modify
> what I sent
> > >> > earlier.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:03 PM, David
> Chang <[email protected]
> > >> >wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Not sure whether the help method
> will do the trick of
> > >> > one-liner code.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I feel that it would be much nice
> if Wicket could have
> > >> > the following
> > >> > > additional method for a
> Componment:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Component setMarkupIdToWicketId().
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Re-using a Wicket Id as markup id
> as convention should
> > >> > be best practice. Am
> > >> > > I right? I am new in wicket and
> sorry if I am wrong.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Best.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --- On Mon, 3/29/10, James Carman
> <[email protected]>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > From: James Carman <[email protected]>
> > >> > > > Subject: Re: better way
> setting up ID for a
> > >> > Wicket component?
> > >> > > > To: [email protected]
> > >> > > > Date: Monday, March 29, 2010,
> 7:16 PM
> > >> > > > helper method?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > protected <T extends
> Component> T
> > >> > setMarkupId(T
> > >> > > > component, String markupId)
> > >> > > > {
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> >   component.setMarkupId(markupId);
> > >> > > >   return
> component;
> > >> > > > }
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 7:00
> PM, David Chang
> > >> > <[email protected]
> > >> > > >wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Here is what I am using
> the follow pattern
> > >> > to set up
> > >> > > > ID for a wicket
> > >> > > > > component:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Label abc = new
> Label("abcd", "abcdedfg");
> > >> > > > >
> > >> >
> abc.setOutputMarkupId(true).setMarkupId(abc.getId());
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > It takes two lines to do
> this.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Can I do something like
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Label abc = new
> Label("abcd",
> > >> > > > >
> > >> >
> "abcdedfg").setOutputMarkupId(true).setMarkupId(???);
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Is this doable? If yes,
> then what should go
> > >> > to replace
> > >> > > > ???
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Thanks!
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> > >> > > > > For additional commands,
> e-mail: [email protected]
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> 




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to