James,

See the patch below; please double-check but it should be still valid
if you haven't updated your POMs since Sunday AM your time.

Regards - Cemal
jWeekend
OO & Java Technologies, Wicket
Consulting, Development, Training
http://jWeekend.com

====================== PATCH STARTS BELOW =============================
Index: pom.xml
===================================================================
--- pom.xml     (revision 78)
+++ pom.xml     (working copy)
@@ -36,4 +36,22 @@
             </plugin>
         </plugins>
     </build>
+
+     <repositories>
+        <repository>
+            <id>JBoss Repo</id>
+            <url>http://repository.jboss.com/maven2</url>
+        </repository>
+
+         <repository>
+               <id>geronimo-snapshots</id>
+               <name>Apache Nexus Snapshots</name>
+
<url>https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group</url>
+               <snapshots>
+                 <enabled>true</enabled>
+               </snapshots>
+         </repository>
+
+    </repositories>
+
 </project>
\ No newline at end of file
Index: owb/pom.xml
===================================================================
--- owb/pom.xml (revision 78)
+++ owb/pom.xml (working copy)
@@ -16,11 +16,12 @@
             <artifactId>wicket-cdi</artifactId>
             <version>${project.version}</version>
         </dependency>
-        <dependency>
-            <groupId>org.apache.openwebbeans</groupId>
-            <artifactId>openwebbeans-impl</artifactId>
-            <version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
-        </dependency>
+<dependency>
+    <groupId>org.apache.openwebbeans</groupId>
+    <artifactId>openwebbeans-impl</artifactId>
+    <version>1.0.0-M4</version>
+</dependency>
+
         <dependency>
             <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
             <artifactId>geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec</artifactId>
Index: owb-example/pom.xml
===================================================================
--- owb-example/pom.xml (revision 78)
+++ owb-example/pom.xml (working copy)
@@ -62,15 +62,11 @@
             <artifactId>wicket-cdi-owb</artifactId>
             <version>${project.version}</version>
         </dependency>
-        <dependency>
-            <groupId>org.apache.openwebbeans</groupId>
-            <artifactId>openwebbeans-web</artifactId>
-            <version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
-        </dependency>
+
         <dependency>
             <groupId>org.apache.openwebbeans</groupId>
             <artifactId>openwebbeans-spi</artifactId>
-            <version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
+            <version>1.0.0-M4</version>
         </dependency>
         <dependency>
             <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
====================== END OF PATCH ABOVE ========================

On 30 March 2010 12:09, James Carman <jcar...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> Cemal,
>
> Please feel free to send me a patch if anything looks crazy.  I have had a
> heck of a time getting all this stuff working.  It's a delicate balance
> (like herding cats)! :)  The OWB folks have checked in my patch to fix one
> of the issues, but we're still hammering out another.
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Cemal Bayramoglu <
> jweekend_for...@cabouge.com> wrote:
>
>> Olivier,
>>
>> I got Jame's stuff [1] up and running (thanks James) with just a few
>> small changes to the POMs - maybe he has stuff already in his local
>> Maven repo that is no longer on the main public repos) working with
>> little effort.
>>
>> If you'd like to make (and maintain ;-) an archetype out of those
>> (based on Apache implementations), or a Galssfish based one,  we would
>> be happy to include those on our LegUp page [2][3].
>>
>> Regards - Cemal
>> jWeekend
>> OO & Java Technologies, Wicket
>> Consulting, Development, Training
>> http://jWeekend.com
>>
>> [1] http://svn.carmanconsulting.com/public/wicket-cdi/trunk
>> [2] http://jweekend.com/dev/LegUp
>> [3] http://code.google.com/p/legup/
>>
>>
>> On 30 March 2010 10:24, Olivier Bourgeois
>> <olivier.bourgeois....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I do also think that it's because Wicket is not a managed framework :
>> > everything is simple unmanaged POJOs except for your classes extending
>> > WebPage which are "managed". I've juste had a quick look at JSF 2.0 and
>> > never worked with it - but I worked with Wicket - so I did not expected
>> > Wicket JEE6 integration to be a drop in replacement for JSF. I do think
>> > Wicket is an alternative framework for JEE6, not a replacement of the
>> > reference framework.
>> >
>> > On one hand JSF2 assumes that you are running a JEE6 AS, so it is tightly
>> > integrated with CDI, and you got all the cool stuff like injection,
>> scopes,
>> > bean validation, etc. On the other hand, Wicket doesn't assume anything
>> > except a web container implementing the servlet spec, so it can't have
>> all
>> > the cool stuff of CDI because it's not built around CDI.
>> >
>> > I think the next step to make Wicket JEE6 integration going further is to
>> > provide some Maven quickstart archetypes, the Weld team is looking for
>> > contributors :
>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/WeldArchetypesInTheSpotlight
>> >
>> > Now that I have something working, and when I will have some spare time,
>> my
>> > next step is to create an archetype for Glassfish. And if some people on
>> > this list have some time, their help is of course welcome :)
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to