In that case +1 JQuery.

D/

On May 1, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:

> there is also no reason to bundle all the components that need that
> kind of js as part of core, they can be stand alone modules.
> 
> -igor
> 
> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
>> Yes, but Wicket has a lot of JS functionality built in (for AJAX, DOM
>> manipulation related to AJAX, modal window, autocomplete, etc...).  Right
>> now all the AJAX stuff is done in home-grown JS.  There's no reason for us
>> to continue to support something that does things like DOM manipulation.  We
>> should use one of the many frameworks out there that do this already.
>> 
>> --
>> Jeremy Thomerson
>> http://www.wickettraining.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Douglas Ferguson <doug...@douglasferguson.us
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I thought wicket's goal was to be agnostic to this debate.
>>> 
>>> D/
>>> 
>>> On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:09 AM, nicolas melendez wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1 YUI.
>>>> I have been working with it, and it is a very good js framework, non
>>>> intrusive with the markup, also was easy (i mean REALLY easy) to
>>> integrate
>>>> to wicket.
>>>> i used YUI components, like rich text editor or modal windows. I don't
>>> know
>>>> the ajax how it is, because i use wicket ajax.
>>>> NM
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Martijn Dashorst <
>>>> martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> iirc the new implementation of Wicket ajax is slated for post 1.5.
>>>>> Something with too many irons in the fire...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Martijn
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
>>>>> <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I also agree that we should use jQuery.  jQuery seems more aligned with
>>>>>> Wicket than YUI.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jeremy Thomerson
>>>>>> http://www.wickettraining.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Fernando Wermus
>>>>>> <fernando.wer...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> +1 Jquery I mean
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus <
>>>>>>> fernando.wer...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy <joewic...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>> i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard
>>>>> now
>>>>>>> ,
>>>>>>>>> used by all the big companies , even microsoft
>>>>>>>>> and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and
>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>> cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for
>>>>> many
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or
>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>> pick YUI
>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <
>>>>>>>>> jer...@wickettraining.com
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be
>>>>>>>>> used.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Jeremy Thomerson
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.wickettraining.com
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
>>>>>>>>>> reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't this an experimental branch?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Ernesto
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky <
>>>>> danisev...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2010/4/26 Istvan Soos <istvan.s...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration
>>>>>>> library
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested
>>>>>>>>>>>>> specifically in YUI 3...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Istvan
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Fernando Wermus.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Fernando Wermus.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>>>>> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications
>>>>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.7
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to